Why the Artemis Program Won’t Be the Same Any Longer: Everything NASA Changed in 2026

NO MOON LANDING YET

Join the mailing list Free weekly briefing, no spam.

In less than a year, NASA’s Artemis program has changed shape. Artemis III is no longer the first landing on the Moon: it is now an Earth-orbit test flight planned for mid-2027, in which an Orion crew will dock with test versions of the SpaceX and Blue Origin landers. The Lunar Gateway space station has been paused. The Space Launch System is being standardized and flown more often. And the first crewed landing, on Artemis IV, is now targeted for 2028, with a second attempt on Artemis V. This article explains what changed, why NASA says it changed, and what could still go wrong.

The short answer

  • Artemis II flew in April 2026. It launched on 1 April and splashed down off San Diego on 10 April, carrying Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, Christina Koch and the Canadian Space Agency’s Jeremy Hansen on the first crewed lunar mission since Apollo 17 in 1972.
  • Artemis III is now a test in Earth orbit (mid-2027). It checks rendezvous and docking between Orion and the commercial landers. There is no lunar landing.
  • Artemis IV and V are the landing missions (2028). NASA expects both landers to be able to deliver crews to the surface by the end of 2028.
  • Gateway is out of the plan for now. NASA paused it in March 2026 and shifted its focus to a surface base, estimated at roughly $20 billion.
  • The goal changed from short visits to a sustained presence. NASA frames the effort as a lunar base first, then a stepping stone to Mars.

What happened: from “landing in Artemis III” to “test first”

When Jared Isaacman was sworn in as NASA Administrator in December 2025, Artemis III was still planned as the first crewed surface landing. On 27 February 2026, a few weeks before Artemis II launched, he announced a course correction: Artemis III would instead be a rendezvous and integrated systems test in Earth orbit with one or both landers, aimed at mid-2027.

NASA’s argument is historical and practical. Isaacman pointed out that Artemis I and Artemis II showed similar hydrogen and helium issues, and that a gap of about three years between launches erodes skills and leaves root causes unresolved. He also compared the plan to Apollo, where Apollo 9 tested the lunar module in Earth orbit in March 1969 before the landing. Jumping from a flyby straight to a landing, he argued, was too big a step. The new target is a launch roughly every 10 months, instead of about every three years.

Artemis III: the new mission, step by step

Artemis III will carry NASA astronauts Randy Bresnik (commander), Andre Douglas and Frank Rubio, plus ESA astronaut Luca Parmitano as pilot, the first ESA astronaut assigned to an Artemis mission. Bob Hines is the backup. The mission lasts about two weeks, according to NASA, and follows this sequence:

  1. Blue Origin launches a test version of its Blue Moon lander into Earth orbit, where it can wait for up to 30 days.
  2. SLS launches Orion from Launch Complex 39B at Kennedy Space Center. Orion docks with the Blue Moon test article and stays attached for about two days. Up to two crew members enter the lander.
  3. Orion undocks. SpaceX then launches a test version of Starship V3, about 52 metres tall, with a docking system on its nose. Orion docks nose-to-nose with it. The crew does not enter Starship.
  4. Orion returns and splashes down in the Pacific.

The mission also tests the Orion docking system for the first time in flight. Because Orion does not need to leave Earth orbit, a structural “spacer” built by NASA replaces the upper stage used on Artemis II.

NASA’s own status updates show the hardware progressing. On 30 September 2026, teams finished stacking the twin solid rocket boosters for Artemis III, all four RS-25 engines are installed on the core stage, and the rocket is due to roll to Pad 39B for a tanking test in the coming months. The spacer and stage adapters are expected to ship to Kennedy early next year. In October 2026, NASA reiterated that Artemis III remains on track for mid-2027 and the crewed landings for 2028.

Gateway is out, the Moon base is in

On 24 March 2026, Isaacman announced that NASA was pausing the Lunar Gateway in its current form and refocusing on the lunar surface. One stated reason was simplification: Gateway’s planned near-rectilinear halo orbit put tight fuel limits on landers travelling between orbit and the surface. NASA says existing Gateway hardware and international commitments will be repurposed for surface systems or other needs wherever possible. JAXA, for example, contributes a pressurized rover for the second phase of the base.

The base is planned in three phases through the end of the decade: early robotic and short crewed visits to test power, communications and navigation; semi-habitable modules and routine logistics; and permanent infrastructure, including long-duration habitation. NASA estimates the cost at about $20 billion. After Artemis V, it aims for crewed surface missions about every six months.

How the landings will work now

The lander architectures have also changed, as presented in NASA’s October 2026 briefing and in reporting based on it.

SpaceX Starship. Starship needs in-space propellant transfer, which has not yet been demonstrated. For a crewed landing, a fully fuelled Starship would dock with Orion in Earth orbit and send the stack to the Moon, rather than meeting Orion in lunar orbit as originally planned. Two crew members would then descend to the surface, return to orbit and fly home in Orion.

Blue Origin Blue Moon MK2. Blue Origin dropped in-space propellant transfer from its approach. Three smaller Blue Moon MK1 spacecraft would act as tugs to move the MK2 lander to lunar orbit, where it meets Orion. The crew procedure is then the same.

NASA is also evaluating two options for the SLS upper stage, the existing interim cryogenic propulsion stage and an extended Centaur V from United Launch Alliance, according to reporting on the briefing. Surface stays are planned at about two hours across two excursions for the first missions, using a lighter “Sortie” spacesuit from Axiom Space that is expected to weigh about half as much as the primary suit.

What stays the same

Orion and SLS remain the way crews get to the Moon, and the destination is still the lunar South Pole, where permanently shadowed regions may hold water ice that could support outposts or propellant production. NASA says more data from robotic CLPS landers is needed before the final landing site decision, and Isaacman has said a return to an Apollo site would be a worthwhile future goal.

The risks

Several elements are still unproven. Starship has not demonstrated in-space refuelling, and Blue Moon had not flown as of NASA’s spring update. NASA’s Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel has raised concerns about lander readiness, the requirement of only one uncrewed test per provider, and the first use of cryogenic propellants on the Moon, since Apollo used storable propellants. Spacesuits are behind schedule too. Artemis II itself found a helium leak in Orion’s propulsion system, which NASA described as acceptable but likely to need a redesign of the valve system, and a minor toilet malfunction. In a September message to staff, Isaacman described the mid-2027 date as “90 days broken to schedule”, a remark he said was meant to push teams to find solutions.

There is also a geopolitical backdrop: China has said it intends to land astronauts on the Moon before 2030, and NASA aims to return before the end of the current US administration’s term.

Frequently asked questions

Is Artemis III going to land on the Moon? No. Artemis III is a crewed Earth-orbit test planned for mid-2027, with rendezvous and docking tests with the Blue Origin and SpaceX landers.

When is the first Artemis moon landing now? Artemis IV is the first planned landing, in 2028, with Artemis V as a second attempt. These dates are targets, and depend on lander development and testing.

Is the Lunar Gateway cancelled? NASA paused Gateway in its current form in March 2026 and removed it from the plans for Artemis IV. The pause does not rule out returning to an orbital outpost later, and hardware may be reused for surface systems.

Who is flying on Artemis III? Randy Bresnik, Luca Parmitano (ESA), Andre Douglas and Frank Rubio, with Bob Hines as backup.

Why did NASA change the plan? NASA’s stated reasons are to test the lander-Orion interface before attempting a landing, to launch more often and keep skills sharp, and to simplify the architecture. Critics point to the readiness of the commercial landers as the main risk.

What is the new Artemis launch cadence? NASA is targeting roughly one launch every 10 months, compared with roughly three years between earlier flights, and aims for crewed surface missions about every six months after Artemis V.

Sources

Shopping Cart